|
課程名稱 |
普通法之信託基本原理與當代議題
Common Law Trusts: Fundamental Concepts and Contemporary Issues |
|
開課學期 |
110-2 |
|
授課對象 |
法律學院 法律研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
劉穎愷 |
|
課號 |
LAW6006 |
|
課程識別碼 |
A21EM06A0 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
1.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
第13 週
星期一1,2,3(8:10~11:10)星期三1,2,3(8:10~11:10)星期五1,2,3(8:10~11:10) |
|
上課地點 |
霖1303霖1303霖1303 |
|
備註 |
本課程以英語授課。密集課程。123 on MAY9.11.13.16.18@Room1702.
限法律學院學生(含輔系、雙修生)
總人數上限：20人 |
|
|
|
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
This course has two main aims. First, it introduces students to fundamental concepts relating to the device of the trust as it has developed in the common law world. The focus will mainly (but not exclusively) be on English law, from which the trust first grew, and against which other common law jurisdictions regularly make reference in the development and application of trust laws. Those concepts include: ‘equity’ (from which trusts developed); ‘proprietary rights’; ‘trust fund’; ‘trustee duties’; ‘beneficial rights’; ‘fixed trusts’, ‘discretionary trusts’; and ‘powers of appointment’. The second aim of the course is to build on these fundamental concepts by exploring several contemporary issues arising in common law trusts. They will include: the justification for trusts; the uses and abuses of trusts; massively discretionary trusts; beneficiaries’ right to information; sham trusts; and the beneficiary principle. |
|
課程目標 |
Provide students with an overview appreciation of the common law trust and select issues |
|
課程要求 |
|
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
|
|
指定閱讀 |
|
|
參考書目 |
|
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
essey |
100% |
Late returns will be penalised at the rate of 10% each hour or part thereof. The essay, which must be typed, should contain no more than 2,500 words: any words exceeding that amount will not be marked. There is no need for a bibliography or footnotes, but your answer should be in prose form, well-structured, and sufficiently supported with relevant cases, materials, arguments etc.
There is no need to rely on any material outside the prescribed reading materials on this course, although you may do so if you wish (and only if it is relevant).
Among other things, the essay will be marked taking into account the extent to which it answers the question, the range and appropriateness of legal materials employed, the structure, and the extent of critical analysis. Imperfect grammar or spelling will not itself lead to a reduction in your mark — after all, the course is a law course, not a language course — but a poorly expressed answer may not convey your message accurately. |
|
|